What could be more symbolic of the end of freedom in Hong Kong than a huge police raid on the offices of the leading Chinese-language tabloid newspaper and the arrest of executives including its owner, Jimmy Lai? The raid took place today and was conducted by a police unit created under the new Beijing-imposed national security law. One of the alleged crimes is reported to be ‘foreign collusion’, a new mainland-style catch-all offence that can lead to years in prison.
The national security law is only a few weeks old and we don’t know exactly how it will be applied. However, it makes bail unlikely. Whether court sessions will even be open to the public is unclear. Police already barred several media organisations from a press conference following the arrests.
What amazes me is how the Hong Kong government and the Hong Kong police force have entirely come on side for the new security law and seemingly flipped into an authoritarian police state without even a murmur.
The Communist Party of China hates Jimmy Lai. He escaped from the mainland as a child by sneaking across the Hong Kong border. His tabloid publications are the absolute antithesis of what the Party thinks the press should be. And he doesn’t give a fuck. He has been the victim of numerous attacks, including fire bombings, that are almost certainly Party-sanctioned or Party-condoned. But now the Party doesn’t need to use thugs to deal with Jimmy Lai because it has its national security law and a pliant, Vichy-style administration.
Here is the Washington Post coverage.
Here is a CBC interview with Jimmy Lai a few days ago.
Here is some coverage in long-form Chinese.
Here is the Twitter feed of Mark Simon, an American media executive who has worked for Jimmy Lai for decades.
Here is the Twitter feed of my old Hong Kong friend and rabid misanthrope Hemlock. I wonder which prison they’ll put him in? That said, he does know more Chinese history than the average paid-up Party member. Maybe they will create a prison library for him.
More, later:
Jimmy Lai was given police bail. That doesn’t mean he will get bail when he is charged which, as I wrote, the National Security Law (NSL) presumes against. What this means is that the police — or rather the people who are telling the police what to do — haven’t yet decided what to charge Lai with. However, the game looks distinctly mainland China in the way it is being played. In addition to NSL charges the police have also mentioned a fraud inquiry. This leaves the classic Chinese fallback of doing him for some trumped-up ‘economic crime’ if the powers that be decide that international (and local Hong Kong) reaction to a national security conviction will be unacceptably strong at this time. Whatever happens, what people from less brutal societies understand by rule of law is out of the window in Hong Kong.
Here is a short new piece about Jimmy Lai from the New Yorker.
Tags: democracy, dissidents, Hong Kong, Jimmy Lai, national security law, Xi Jinping
August 10, 2020 at 4:33 pm
I am a Hongkonger. I read your book about the Asian’s godfather long time ago and impressed your question that, under the pull between Beijing gov. and Hong Kong Civil society, where Hong Kong would go ultimately. I am sad that the answer is obviously shown today. Our Civil Society ( or so called “power of people” ) is nothing while facing the absolute power of tyranny.
August 10, 2020 at 8:38 pm
The power of the people isn’t nothing. It is just a long war.